With reference to a letter of the 9th Instt. states that, whatever Rule was laid down in 1814, a subsequent G.O. of the 23rd May 1823, allowed Officers of Company's service to hold Divisional Commands and as a matter of Course, the allowances of such commands, without limitation of rank and that this order has not been refered to by the Military Auditor General in his report requests that the Military Auditor General be called upon to report why the Rule o 1814 was inserted in the code of 1849 while the G.O. 23rd May 1823 which is at direct variance with the Rule of 1814 should it have been applicabe to Company's Officers has been omitted.

Ministry/ Department/ Residency	Military
Branch	Military
From Year / Date (YYYY-MM-DD)	1852-02
To Year / Date (YYYY-MM-DD)	1852-02
Source Organization	NA
Identifier	PR_000000725266
File No./Reference No./Sheet No./Folio No.	116
Location	NA
Part No.	C
File Size	NA
Pages	NA
Call Number	NA
Publisher	NA
Subject	NA
Creator	NA
Accession Number	NA
Series	NA
Year of Publication	NA
Bundle Barcode	NA
Location Code	NA
File Barcode	NA