Enquiry made from Indian Embacy; Washington and Indian High Commissioner; London regarding the followed byPractice of the U.S.A of the U.K govt for the upgrading of their consular mission abroad.2.Decision that prior concurrence of the remaning govt is not necesary for the upgrading of Indian Concular missions abroad3.the GI also shots not insist for their prior concurrance for the upgrading of foreign consular mission in India.

Keywords	Government, Concurrence, Consular, Prior, Consulate, India, Practice, Missions, General, London
Ministry/ Department/ Residency	ministry of external affairs
Branch	PROTOCOL-II
From Year / Date (YYYY-MM-DD)	1951
To Year / Date (YYYY-MM-DD)	1951
Source Organization	NA
Identifier	NAIDLF01052263
File No./Reference No./Sheet No./Folio No.	2-24-PE-II-51.
Location	R-4
Part No.	NA
File Size	7.8 MB
Pages	8
Call Number	NA
Publisher	NA
Subject	Enquiry made from Indian Embacy; Washington and Indian High Commissioner; London regarding the followed byPractice of the U.S.A of the U.K govt for the upgrading of their consular mission abroad.2.Decision that prior concurrence of the remaning govt is not necesary for the upgrading of Indian Concular missions abroad3.the GI also shots not insist for their prior concurrance for the upgrading of foreign consular mission in India.
Creator	NA
Accession Number	NA
Series	NA
Year of Publication	NA
Language	English
Bundle Barcode	NAIDLB00032216
Location Code	0
File Barcode	NAIDLF01052263
QC Certificate No.	QC_20241211DL
Bundle No.	19